"Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
:

>
>
> begin 666 DSCF1036_wu.jpg
>
> Attachment saved: C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\My
> Documents\Xnews\DSCF1036_wu.jpg `
> end
>
>

Nice shot Don
just one minor thing the reference to yenc If you are so concerned
about"yEnc Babble" why bate the pro-yEnc_antiyEnc issue by putting
"non-Yenc" in you subject. Seems to me you me and others should just let
sleeping dogs lie.

By the way you complained I have not been posting any pics how about the
skydiving shots I just posted?

"Clairbear" > wrote in message
...
> "Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>>
>> begin 666 DSCF1036_wu.jpg
>>
>> Attachment saved: C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\My
>> Documents\Xnews\DSCF1036_wu.jpg `
>> end
>>
>>
>
> Nice shot Don
> just one minor thing the reference to yenc If you are so concerned
> about"yEnc Babble" why bate the pro-yEnc_antiyEnc issue by putting
> "non-Yenc" in you subject. Seems to me you me and others should just let
> sleeping dogs lie.
>
> By the way you complained I have not been posting any pics how about the
> skydiving shots I just posted?


Really nice photos! Keep it up. (With files that large, an index would be
appreciated by the dial-up folks.)

The "NON-yEnc" thingy was just me pulling your chain.

gdp

"Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
:

>
> "Clairbear" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> begin 666 DSCF1036_wu.jpg
>>>
>>> Attachment saved: C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\My
>>> Documents\Xnews\DSCF1036_wu.jpg `
>>> end
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nice shot Don
>> just one minor thing the reference to yenc If you are so concerned
>> about"yEnc Babble" why bate the pro-yEnc_antiyEnc issue by putting
>> "non-Yenc" in you subject. Seems to me you me and others should just
>> let sleeping dogs lie.
>>
>> By the way you complained I have not been posting any pics how about
>> the skydiving shots I just posted?
>
>
> Really nice photos! Keep it up. (With files that large, an index
> would be appreciated by the dial-up folks.)
>
> The "NON-yEnc" thingy was just me pulling your chain.
>
> gdp
>
>
>
>

the were 4x6s@250dpi maybe 75dpi would have been betterI'll try to include
an index next time I have this much

"Clairbear" > wrote in message
...
> "Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Clairbear" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> begin 666 DSCF1036_wu.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment saved: C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\My
>>>> Documents\Xnews\DSCF1036_wu.jpg `
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nice shot Don
>>> just one minor thing the reference to yenc If you are so concerned
>>> about"yEnc Babble" why bate the pro-yEnc_antiyEnc issue by putting
>>> "non-Yenc" in you subject. Seems to me you me and others should just
>>> let sleeping dogs lie.
>>>
>>> By the way you complained I have not been posting any pics how about
>>> the skydiving shots I just posted?
>>
>>
>> Really nice photos! Keep it up. (With files that large, an index
>> would be appreciated by the dial-up folks.)
>>
>> The "NON-yEnc" thingy was just me pulling your chain.
>>
>> gdp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> the were 4x6s@250dpi maybe 75dpi would have been betterI'll try to include
> an index next time I have this much


Um, Clair ol' buddy....I said "keep it up" long before all of your flood of
huge photos arrived. Why not post large numbers of photos no larger than,
say, 800x600 MAX, compressed 50-60%, plus an index. Then offer larger
versions by request only? That way, the group may even look at your photos.

Unless, of course, you post hundreds of hanger queens........

"Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
:

>
> "Clairbear" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Clairbear" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> begin 666 DSCF1036_wu.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Attachment saved: C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\My
>>>>> Documents\Xnews\DSCF1036_wu.jpg `
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice shot Don
>>>> just one minor thing the reference to yenc If you are so
>>>> concerned about"yEnc Babble" why bate the pro-yEnc_antiyEnc issue
>>>> by putting "non-Yenc" in you subject. Seems to me you me and
>>>> others should just let sleeping dogs lie.
>>>>
>>>> By the way you complained I have not been posting any pics how
>>>> about the skydiving shots I just posted?
>>>
>>>
>>> Really nice photos! Keep it up. (With files that large, an index
>>> would be appreciated by the dial-up folks.)
>>>
>>> The "NON-yEnc" thingy was just me pulling your chain.
>>>
>>> gdp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> the were 4x6s@250dpi maybe 75dpi would have been betterI'll try to
>> include an index next time I have this much
>
>
> Um, Clair ol' buddy....I said "keep it up" long before all of your
> flood of huge photos arrived. Why not post large numbers of photos no
> larger than, say, 800x600 MAX, compressed 50-60%, plus an index. Then
> offer larger versions by request only? That way, the group may even
> look at your photos.
>
> Unless, of course, you post hundreds of hanger queens........
>
>
>
>
>

i sized them down to 4x6@250 dpi I guess 100 or perhaps 75 dpi would
have worked better

"> Um, Clair ol' buddy....I said "keep it up" long before all of your flood
of
> huge photos arrived. Why not post large numbers of photos no larger than,
> say, 800x600 MAX, compressed 50-60%, plus an index. Then offer larger
> versions by request only? That way, the group may even look at your
> photos.
>
> Unless, of course, you post hundreds of hanger queens........

Didn't see a one of them. KF works wonders.

vr,

jm



>

Amen! :D

"Jim Morris" > wrote in message
...
>
> "> Um, Clair ol' buddy....I said "keep it up" long before all of your
> flood of
>> huge photos arrived. Why not post large numbers of photos no larger
>> than, say, 800x600 MAX, compressed 50-60%, plus an index. Then offer
>> larger versions by request only? That way, the group may even look at
>> your photos.
>>
>> Unless, of course, you post hundreds of hanger queens........
>
> Didn't see a one of them. KF works wonders.
>
> vr,
>
> jm
>
>
>
>>
>

"Clairbear" > schreef in bericht
...
> "Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
> :
>> Um, Clair ol' buddy....I said "keep it up" long before all of your
>> flood of huge photos arrived. Why not post large numbers of photos no
>> larger than, say, 800x600 MAX, compressed 50-60%, plus an index. Then
>> offer larger versions by request only? That way, the group may even
>> look at your photos.
>
> i sized them down to 4x6@250 dpi I guess 100 or perhaps 75 dpi would
> have worked better

dpi is not the size of the picture, dpi is used to inform the printer how
many dots he must print on a inch of paper.
dpi is also used when you scan a picture, a picture 10 inch wide scanned
with 250dpi would be 2500 pixels wide.
How big a picture would be on the screen of a monitor depends on the
resolution setting of the monitor.
Monitors have standard resolutions like 640x480 - 800x600 - 1024x768 -
1152x864 - 1280x720 - 1280x800 1280x1024
Flat screens use mostly 1280x1024 for best results, wide screens use
1280x720 or 1280x800 depending on the optimal resolution for the monitor.
I prefer a picture posted 1200 pixels wide, as my monitor resolutions are
1280x1024
Many people have now screens with a resolution 1280 wide.
The picture included in this e-mail is 1200x897 pixels.
Greets
Willem

"Willem Van der Voort" > wrote in
:

>
> "Clairbear" > schreef in bericht
> ...
>> "Don Pyeatt" > wrote in
>> :
>>> Um, Clair ol' buddy....I said "keep it up" long before all of your
>>> flood of huge photos arrived. Why not post large numbers of photos
>>> no larger than, say, 800x600 MAX, compressed 50-60%, plus an index.
>>> Then offer larger versions by request only? That way, the group may
>>> even look at your photos.
>>
>> i sized them down to 4x6@250 dpi I guess 100 or perhaps 75 dpi would
>> have worked better
>
> dpi is not the size of the picture, dpi is used to inform the printer
> how many dots he must print on a inch of paper.
> dpi is also used when you scan a picture, a picture 10 inch wide
> scanned with 250dpi would be 2500 pixels wide.
> How big a picture would be on the screen of a monitor depends on the
> resolution setting of the monitor.
> Monitors have standard resolutions like 640x480 - 800x600 - 1024x768 -
> 1152x864 - 1280x720 - 1280x800 1280x1024
> Flat screens use mostly 1280x1024 for best results, wide screens use
> 1280x720 or 1280x800 depending on the optimal resolution for the
> monitor. I prefer a picture posted 1200 pixels wide, as my monitor
> resolutions are 1280x1024
> Many people have now screens with a resolution 1280 wide.
> The picture included in this e-mail is 1200x897 pixels.
> Greets
> Willem
>
>
>
> begin 666 starfigter kl br.jpg
>
> Attachment saved: C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\My
> Documents\Xnews\starfigter kl br.jpg `
> end
>
>

You make some valid points Dpi multipied by size will give you the Number
of pixels wide and high But i think part of what don was getting at was the
overall size of the imagemsot of my files were aproaching 1 MB which is a
bit large for the NG I will try to make them more like 500k and smaller ion
the future